While surveys reflect the sentiment of the people, an official of the Catholic Bishops’ Conference of the Philippines said it does not reflect the truth.
Father Jerome Secillano, executive secretary of the CBCP Public Affairs Committee, said this in reaction to the online survey of the House of Representatives on same sex union.
“Surveys do not reflect the truth. They merely gauge the sentiment of the people,” he said in an interview.
“So, even if majority of Filipinos favor same sex union and call it by any other name such as civil partnership, the truth is such union is still called marriage,” added Secillano.
The CBCP official stressed that marriage must be between a man and a woman as enshrined in the constitution, the Family Code and as ordained by God.
In the past, Catholic prelates opposed any plan to legalize same sex marriage in the country even for civil union.
The Church leaders insist that marriage should be between a man and a woman only.
“Marriage as willed by God is between a man and a woman,” Cubao Bishop Honesto Ongtioco said in a previous interview.
Then Lipa Archbishop Ramon Arguelles said same sex marriage is not only against Divine Law, but is also against human and Natural law.
“The purpose of marriage is to have a family, kids…but if the couple is of the same sex the one who will suffer the most in this situation is their child because its not normal,” he said.
“In the eyes of God, a married couple is a man and a woman,” Arguelles added.
Last week, the House of Representatives began holding an online survey in its official website regarding same-sex unions as a form of civil partnership in the country.
The poll asks respondents on whether they are in favor, against, or undecided on whether it was time to legalize same-sex unions in the Philippines. (Leslie Ann Aquino)
https://garrettgcpz20987.thechapblog.com/34470598/descubre-cГіmo-usar-el-cГіdigo-promocional-1xbet-para-apostar-free-of-charge-en-argentina-mГ©xico-chile-y-mГЎs
https://ebiz-directory.com/listings745950/activa-tu-c%C3%B3digo-promocional-1xbet-y-gana-sin-dep%C3%B3sito
Elon Musk stood next to President Donald Trump in the Oval Office on Friday, but the physical proximity belied a growing philosophical divide between two of the world’s most powerful men, resulting in the tech mogul’s abrupt announcement that he is departing Washington — without having achieved his goal of decimating the federal government.
[url=https://kra–33—at.ru]kra33 at[/url]
Trump took a more charitable view of Musk’s tenure during a sprawling news conference in which he also declined to rule out pardoning Sean “Diddy” Combs, who is on trial on charges of sex trafficking and other alleged crimes; said he dislikes “the concept” of former first lady Jill Biden being forced to testify before Congress about her husband’s mental fitness; and predicted again that Iran is on the cusp of making a deal that would suspend its pursuit of nuclear weapons.
[url=https://kra-33-at.com]kra33 СЃСЃ[/url]
In a battle of plutocrats against populists, Bannon, a longtime advocate for reducing the size and scope of government, found Musk’s methods and policy preferences to be sharply at odds with those of the MAGA movement. So, ultimately, did Musk, who broke with Trump repeatedly on agenda items as narrow as limiting visas for foreign workers and as broad as Trump’s signature “big beautiful” budget bill — which Musk belittled for threatening to add trillions of dollars to the national debt.
“I was, like, disappointed to see the massive spending bill, frankly, which increases the budget deficit, not just decrease it, and undermines the work that the DOGE team is doing,” Musk said in an interview with CBS’ “Sunday Morning,” which will air this weekend.
[url=https://kra–33–at.ru]kraken33[/url]
“I love the gold on the ceiling,” he said.
Musk has argued that inertia throttled his efforts to reduce government spending — a conclusion that raises questions about whether he was naive about the challenge of the mission he undertook.
“The federal bureaucracy situation is much worse than I realized,” he told The Washington Post this week. “I thought there were problems, but it sure is an uphill battle trying to improve things in D.C., to say the least.”
On Friday, he drew an implicit parallel between American government and the Nazi regime that committed a genocide, invoking the “banality of evil” that Hannah Arendt used to describe the atrocities in Germany.
kraken33
https://kra-33cc.com